The issue was confused because of a last minute
amendment proposed by Councilman Kernodle to amend the intergovernmental
agreement between the Town and Charleston County and the State of South Carolina. These agreements are standardized and imply
a point of no return for a municipality.
After Town Council votes to accept the project as it has been specified
at the time of the agreement, there is no way to force further changes.
Councilman Kernodle announced to the rest of Council
a proposed amendment the night before the meeting. In his email, he stated,
“As an elected official I believe that it is my duty
to support the beliefs of the voters who put me here, not necessarily my own
beliefs. The main way of me accessing what the people want is through these
correspondence. The majority (by far) of these communications lead me to the
conclusion that people want the DBH to be 18" and include all species; to
lower the planned turn lane on Harborview Road from 13' to 12'; to extend the
bike paths and sidewalks all the way to the JI connector; and to make sure that
the designated wildlife crossings have proper fencing.”
At the meeting, the amendment to the Municipal Agreement
he proposed was:
1. Reduce
the center lane from 13’ to 12’.
2. Extend
sidewalks and bicycle paths to the James Island Connector.
3. Create
wildlife safety protections from the Dr. Thomas Buxton, Jr. Bridge to Mikell
Drive.
4. James
Island Town Council is required to review and approve all plans for said
wildlife protection before they are implemented.
I had also received emails calling for these
changes. I also received a copy of the
email from Nix 526 asking their supporters to contact Council. Apparently 39 Nix 526 supporters responded
to the call. There were 19 emails from
Town residents and 20 from others (Yes, I checked each one.) I always keep in mind that there are nearly
9,000 registered voters in the Town of James Island.
The day of the meeting, our Town Administrator
contacted Charleston County about amending the agreement. They spoke to the South Carolina Department
of Transportation, and concluded that passing the agreement with an amendment
was the same thing as voting no. The
Town Administrator also checked with the South Carolina Municipal Association. They agreed that amending the agreement was
not acceptable. If the majority of
Council insisted that the current plan requires changes, then they need to vote
against the municipal agreement. If a
modified plan could be negotiated, then Council could later vote yes for the
modified plan.
I don’t favor making any of these changes conditions for the completion of the
Harbor View Road project.
In late 2010, the Town asked that the proposed center
lane on Harbor View Road be reduced from 15’ to 12’. I supported that change. Charleston County Roadwise asked SCDOT, which
said the standard is 15’. The Town hired
an engineering consultant for a second opinion, who said the same.
Fortunately, when Councilman Qualey began
working on the issue, SCDOT compromised.
The key difference was that Councilman Qualey put together a majority of County
Council to support modifications to a project that was in his district. The center lane was reduced from 15’ to
13’.
SCDOT didn’t just meet the Town’s initial demand
half way. They gave us more than half. There were 3 feet at issue, and they gave us
2.
It is hard to see the “no compromise” amendment as
anything other than a “poison pill.”
What that means is that whole point of making the demand, insisting on
the Town’s initial 12’ lane width or nothing, is that it will be unacceptable
to SCDOT. And that means the Harbor
View Road project would be blocked.
What about the condition of extending the sidewalks
and bike paths? I think extending the sidewalks and bicycle
paths to the James Island Connector is a great idea. I strongly support this, and have been
especially interested in this goal since the Town has become involved in the
Battery to Beach intergovernmental working group. Unfortunately, the causeways are very
narrow in places. Putting in bike lanes
and sidewalks would be very expensive, particularly due to the environmental
issues involved in filling salt marsh.
Demanding that Charleston County come up with several million dollars
more or else nothing, looks to be a poison pill aimed at blocking the project.
Charleston County Roadwise has expressed willingness
to include some wildlife protection.
They are willing to put up an official wildlife crossing sign and plan
the landscaping to encourage the animals to cross there. My interpretation is that these would be
limited to where the narrow lakes cross the road. While I am skeptical that animals will pay
much attention to crosswalks or landscaping, it isn’t very expensive. On the other hand, if the proposal is for
some kind of barrier from the bridge at James Island creek all the way to
Mikell drive, then such barriers are going through people’s front yards. I would strongly oppose any such plan. Again, it looks like a poison pill making
the entire project unfeasible.
Fortunately, the amendments were defeated. The vote was 3 to 2. Blank, Mullinax, and Woolsey opposed the
amendments. Kernodle and Berry voted in
favor. And then came the vote for the
Harbor View Road project, which was approved 3 to 2. Blank, Mullinax, and Woolsey voted in favor. Kernodle and Berry voted to block the project.
This project has taken far too long (more than 7 years by my reckoning.) Adding a center lane will improve traffic flow by allowing vehicles making left turns during rush hours not to block traffic and by allowing vehicles to turn left onto Harbor View when traffic coming from their left permits.
ReplyDelete