Friday, March 23, 2018

Another Car Wash on Folly Road?

     The owners of Huff's Seafood on Folly Road have been trying to sell their property for some time. They found a potential buyer who wants the property for a full-service car wash.    As usual, the potential buyer came to the Town to make sure that their plans were consistent with our ordinances.

       The Town does not own this property and it is not determining what will be placed there.   To repeat, the current owner is trying to sell and a potential buyer would like to operate a full service car wash.

       The Town's Planning Director applies our land-use ordinances.  As a practical matter, I promptly learn about most proposed developments in the Town and especially when what for us is a major commercial redevelopment is proposed for Folly Road.   However, our ordinances generally leave little room for discretion and there is just no question of the Mayor being in a position to make a decision about whether a proposed development will go forward. 

       The initial plan for the car wash was contrary to Town ordinances in two ways.   One problem was that cars would wait under the canopy of a grand tree.  It is the large live oak tree to the left of Huff's Seafood.  The second problem was that a portion of the car wash would encroach too near the critical line, which is the official demarcation of the edge of the salt marsh.

       Those seeking to open the car wash could have changed their plans, but under Town ordinances, they have the legal right to seek a variance.   Our Town ordinances follow the requirements of the South Carolina Code, which gives the Town's Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA)  the sole authority to grant variances. 

       The Planning Director processes applications for variances, but does not approve them and has no authority to reject them.  The BZA is appointed by Town Council.   It acts as a quasi-judicial body.   State law prohibits the Town staff, the Mayor or Town Council from either granting or denying variances.

      An application was made for the variances, the public was notified, but the application was withdrawn.   Those trying to open the car wash chose to redo their plan.   Their new plan seeks to put part of the car wash on the neighboring parcel, which is the location of Title Max.   With this change, they will no longer encroach on the required buffer for the marsh, but they still plan to have cars waiting under the canopy of the oak tree. 

      An applicant can always withdraw a pending application. To prevent them from applying repeatedly, there is a one year waiting period before reapplying.   However, the BZA may grant a waiver of the waiting period at the request of the applicant.   At their March meeting, the BZA granted the wavier.

       Perhaps as soon as April, the BZA will consider an application for a variance regarding cars waiting under the canopy of the grand tree.   I believe their decision should depend on the potential harm to the tree.  The applicant will almost certainly have an arborist on hand to testify.

       However, there is an additional requirement that applies to this parcel because of its location.   The underlying zoning is community commercial, and car washes are a "use of right" in a community commercial zone.  But this parcel is in the Folly Road Overlay.   This overlay zoning district makes a variety of uses "special exceptions."    As a vehicular service, a car wash is prohibited unless the Town grants a special exception.  Our ordinances give the sole authority to grant such special exceptions to the BZA.

          A requirement that a car wash obtain a special exception allows the BZA to impose additional conditions on the use.    Usually, such conditions are aimed at protecting residential neighbors from excessive noise or light.   I believe protecting the environment, particularly the Town waterways from spills, would also be possible.

         However, I believe that the BZA may also consider the broader purposes of the Folly Road Overlay.
   (B)   Purpose and intent.  The purpose of the FRC-O, Folly Road Corridor Overlay Zoning District, is to create a corridor that is well-planned and attractive through the implementation of consistent land use and design standards with adjacent jurisdictions and utilizing traffic safety measures and access management for vehicles and pedestrians to ensure safe and efficient traffic movement.
         There are several uses that require a special exception.   Examples include fast food restaurants and gas stations.   I believe that the reason for this provision is to avoid having Folly Road become a strip of gas stations and fast food restaurants and, maybe, car washes. 

          I must admit that another car wash, even a "full service" one, is not the sort of business that I would count as an improvement for Folly Road.   I think that the best way to improve Folly Road, which is the goal of both the Folly Road Overlay and Rethink Folly Road. is to recruit desirable businesses to the area and have them seek to buy land that the current owners are trying to sell.  The Town has been looking into funding just such an effort.   We hope that this can be a joint project with the other local governments participating in the Folly Road Overlay and Rethink Folly Road.

         A few days ago, I read on "Next Door" a copy of a post from "Save James Island" that claimed that the Town's BZA was meeting without having posted an agenda and implying that the Town was trying to sneak in this car wash without public scrutiny.   In truth, an agenda had been posted as usual and all that was before the BZA was a proposed waiver of the waiting period.   In no way has the Town been seeking to have a car wash at this or any other location, much less trying to do so in secret.   It is sad that there has been a regular pattern of false and malicious rumors.   It is just dirty politics.

        The Town, and more specifically, the Town's BZA, must apply our ordinances in a fair and reasonable way.  Any unreasonable or arbitrary action by the BZA will only result in an appeal to circuit court with the result that the car wash (or worse) will appear along with the Town having to pay substantial legal fees.    We must do things right.  We must follow the proper procedures.

Friday, March 16, 2018

Gateway Park -- Report on County Council Meeting

County Council considered the Town's proposal for a pocket park at Camp and Folly last Tuesday.   The Town requested that the County lease the parcel for $1 per year for 5 years with three (or two) renewals.

The vote was 5 to 4 against. 

Voting in favor were Chairman Rawl, and Councilmen Qualey, Sass and Schweers.   (These were the same four who voted in favor at the Finance Committee meeting.) 

Voting against were members of Council Darby, Johnson, Moody, Pryor and Summey.    (Darby had abstained at the Finance Committee and Summey had been absent.) 

Everyone at the public hearing spoke in favor.   Thank you to Betsy La Force, Katie Zimmerman, Lauren Gelatly, and Margaret Fabri. 

There was also work behind the scenes.   Thank you to Mayor Tecklenburg, who wrote County Council in support and thank you to City Councilwoman Carol Jackson who put that together.   James Island's state Representative Peter McCoy lobbied hard for a fifth vote.   (I had five votes counted in our favor going into the meeting, but it didn't work out that way.)

And, of course, thank you to the four members of Council who voted in favor, including James Island's Councilman, Joe Qualey.   

Where do we go from here? 

At the meeting, Councilman Pryor and Summey mentioned using Greenbelt funds to make this happen.  Councilman Pryor asked to put the issue on the agenda for the next meeting.  I believe Councilman Summey is committed to finding Greenbelt funds to help pay for the project.

So, I am cautiously optimistic. 


Saturday, March 10, 2018

Gateway Park at Camp and Folly

The Town of James Island has proposed that the property at the corner of Camp and Folly, where there is currently a vacant Subway, become "Gateway Park."    Charleston County owns the property, having purchased it in order to obtain the right of way for the Folly and Camp improvement project.



The proposed park will include a park benches, landscaping, a bus shelter, public parking, and way finding signage.   It will provide a bit of green space in the "Commercial Core" of James Island.

Town has requested that Charleston County lease the property to the Town for $1 per year for five years with three renewable terms.   The Town will be responsible for cleaning up the property and constructing the park.

The Town's proposal was presented to the Rethink Folly Road Steering Committee.   The Committee passed a resolution endorsing the project and requesting that Charleston County lease the property to the Town.

County Council's Finance Committee voted 4 to 3 to approve the lease.   There will be a public hearing at the County Council meeting on Tuesday, March 13 at 6 PM at Council Chambers in North Charleston.   County Council will then vote on the proposed lease.

At the Finance Committee, Chairman Rawl, Councilman Qualey, Sass and Schweers all voted in favor. 

In opposition were Councilwoman Johnson and Councilmen Moody and Pryor.   Those opposed were willing to sell the property to the Town for approximately $600,000.    They were not opposed to the project, but were not willing for the County to lease the property at a modest price.  The likely effect of their stand will be for the County to sell to a developer with the likely result of a third gas station at the intersection.

Councilwoman Johnson represents a substantial portion of James Island, but she said she would like to see the property sold and the money used for projects on Johns Island.    It might be helpful if some of her constituents on James Island would contact her and ask that she support projects for our Island as well!

There are nine members of County Council.   At the Finance Committee meeting, Councilman Darby abstained.   The real question mark is Councilman Summey, who was absent.   If Summey votes iffavor, then it will pass.   If he joins Pryor, Johnson, and Moody, then it will fail on a tie.n

The Town will fund the creation of the park using funds from its hospitality tax.   Nearly of the money from that tax is raised from restaurants on Folly Road in the commercial core.   This project will put some of that money back into the area.  This is consistent with the mission of Rethink Folly Road seeking to make it destination for people to stop, shop, eat and drink.   Many municipalities in South Carolina fund similar projects with the hospitality tax revenue.

If you can, please come to the public hearing next Tuesday and ask for the County's help with a gateway park rather than a third gas station at Camp and Folly.